On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:58:50 -0700, Jakub Lach wrote: > Sorry for being so sparse, but I was just talking about general > impression from few tries I gave it. > > /proc wasn't main problem, usually I didn;t have any use for it. > > Basically it wasn't for me what it aimed to be- a frugal replacement for > DE. Half of things didn't work, other half worked erratically. Starting > from bare panel/openbox looked more viable. > OK, fair enough. All I can say is that LXDE works perfectly for me in 9.1- RELEASE. I just had the problem of compiling lxpanel in 10-CURRENT, which was worked around using asomers' suggestion to try gcc instead of clang for that port. Thanks for the reply.Received on Fri Jun 07 2013 - 20:48:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:38 UTC