Re: using multiple interfaces for same Network Card

From: Yasir hussan <kolyasir_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:03:18 +0500
U say u were successfully using vlans by vlandev in  FreeBSD , Can u send
me exact commands and configuration which u were applying, It will be very
helpful for me...

Thank

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:39 PM, John-Mark Gurney <jmg_at_funkthat.com> wrote:

> Yasir hussan wrote this message on Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 23:32 +0500:
> > Yes, i want to use them as vlan interface, Does any one has used
> *vlandev*,
> > after seen this
> >
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-configure-freebsd-vlans-with-ifconfig-command/i
> > tried to use it as
> >
> > ifconfig vlan11  create 10.10.11.1  255.255.255.0 vlan 11  vlandev arge0
> > ifconfig vlan12  create 10.10.12.1  255.255.255.0 vlan 12  vlandev arge0
> > ifconfig vlan13  create 10.10.13.1  255.255.255.0 vlan 13  vlandev arge0
> > ifconfig vlan14  create 10.10.14.1  255.255.255.0 vlan 14  vlandev arge0
> >
> > i was expecting that it will create interfaces which will work under
> arge0,
> > and will able to ping from any pc, Does any one have used it, kindly
> guide
> > me about it
>
> vlans are a way to add different broadcast domains..  You need to have a
> vlan capable switch/machine connected and properly configured... If you
> plug in the machine to a normal switch, and the other machine isn't vlan
> aware not much will happen...
>
> Now if you configure your machine to route (net.inet.ip.forwarding) and
> setup the pc w/ the proper routing tables, you'll be able to ping the
> machines...
>
> If this doesn't help, please talk w/ a local network engineer to help
> you configure your network properly...
>
> I'm succussfully using FreeBSD with both vlans, and aliases (multiple
> ips on a single interface aka broadcast domain)...
>
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Ian FREISLICH <ianf_at_clue.co.za> wrote:
> >
> > > Yasir hussan wrote:
> > > > Thanks for notic but all the elebration was for make alias on one
> > > > interface but i want to have multiple interface, i can no where that
> > > > some one would have tring to creating new interfaces and using them,
> > > > or may be i am missing something, just send its solution if have,
> > > > solution should be for
> > >
> > > I still think you're confusing Linux semantics with FreeBSD semantics.
> > >
> > > On linux you would have:
> > > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:C9:53:0B:61
> > >           inet addr:10.0.0.1  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> > >           inet6 addr: fe80::21e:c9ff:fe53:b61/64 Scope:Link
> > >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> > >           RX packets:211328068 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > >           TX packets:368394006 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > >           RX bytes:34065846811 (31.7 GiB)  TX bytes:476377525764 (443.6
> > > GiB)
> > >           Interrupt:169 Memory:e6000000-e6011100
> > >
> > > eth0:1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:C9:53:0B:61
> > >           inet addr:10.0.1.1  Bcast:10.0.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> > >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> > >           Interrupt:169 Memory:e6000000-e6011100
> > >
> > >
> > > On FreeBSD you would have:
> > >
> > > re0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu
> 1500
> > >
> > >
> options=8209b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE>
> > >         ether 54:04:a6:96:0c:1e
> > >         inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
> > >         inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
> > >         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
> > >         status: active
> > >
> > > These are both the same thing.  Is there any particular reason that
> > > you want multiple interfaces?  I can't see a use for it beyond "it's
> > > what I'm used to seeing" unless they're VLAN interfaces.
>
> --
>   John-Mark Gurney                              Voice: +1 415 225 5579
>
>      "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
>
Received on Tue Mar 12 2013 - 18:03:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:35 UTC