On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Gary Palmer <gpalmer_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 01:29:27PM +0100, Daniel Nebdal wrote: >> Going by Zaphod's recommendation of using a /32 for each IP, how about this? >> >> ifconfig arge0 inet 192.168.1.100/32 >> ifconfig arge0 alias 192.169.1.100/32 >> >> I wouldn't recommend 192.169, though - only 192.168.x.x is reserved >> for private networks, and 192.169 is a valid IP-routable prefix, >> assigned to some US company. >> To be exact: The ranges from RFC1918 are 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0 /20 >> and 192.168.0.0/24. > > I think you mean the RFC1918 ranges are > > 10.0.0.0/8 (aka 10.0.0.0 through 10.255.255.255) > 172.16.0.0/12 (aka 172.16.0.0 through 172.31.255.255) > 192.168.0.0/16 (aka 192.168.0.0 through 192.168.255.255) > > Regards, > > Gary Uhm, yes. I can't have been entirely awake when I wrote that.Received on Sat Mar 16 2013 - 22:22:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:35 UTC