On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:26 PM, hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Davide Italiano <davide_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:17 AM, hiren panchasara >> <hiren.panchasara_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've prepared a patch to add core and uncore events support for >>> haswell processor. >>> I do not have the hardware to test this. It applies cleanly and >>> compiles fine though. >>> >>> http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_hw.txt >>> >>> This is initial version of patch and manpage is still missing. I will >>> add it in a few days. >>> >>> Any help in testing is appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hiren >> >> It seems Intel won't release this before June (at least to my knowledge). >> I would claim it'll be difficult to real test this before that date >> unless someone has prerelease hardware. > > Indeed. I've posted it here just to let larger audience know and avoid > possible duplicate work. > > We will wait till we get the hardware to test with. I recently got a ref haswell box to play with. Initial dmesg looks like this: CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000 _at_ 2.60GHz (2594.05-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x306c2 Family = 0x6 Model = 0x3c Stepping = 2 Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> Features2=0x7ffafbff<SSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,<b11>,FMA,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,TSCDLT,AESNI,XSAVE,OSXSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND> AMD Features=0x2c100800<SYSCALL,NX,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM> AMD Features2=0x21<LAHF,ABM> Standard Extended Features=0x2fbb<GSFSBASE,TSCADJ,SMEP,ENHMOVSB,INVPCID> TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics real memory = 8589934592 (8192 MB) avail memory = 8034803712 (7662 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600 ACPI APIC Table: <DELL CBX3 > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 8 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 SMT threads cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 cpu4 (AP): APIC ID: 4 cpu5 (AP): APIC ID: 5 cpu6 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu7 (AP): APIC ID: 7 Diffs at: http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_hw.txt Tests I've done: http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_hw_pmccontrol.txt http://www.strugglingcoder.info/patches/hwpmc_hw_pmctest.txt I am following 325462-045US Jan 2013 sw dev manual and below are the counters which I cannot poke at via pmcstat: Core: "L2_RQSTS.DEMAND_DATA_RD_MISS" "L2_RQSTS.DEMAND_DATA_RD_HIT" "L2_RQSTS.ALL_DEMAND_DATA_RD" "L2_RQSTS.ALL_DEMAND_MISS" "L2_RQSTS.ALL_DEMAND_REFERENCES" "L2_RQSTS.MISS" "CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING" "PAGE_WALKER_LOADS.DTLB_L1" "PAGE_WALKER_LOADS.ITLB_L1" "BACLEARS.ANY" "L2_LINES_OUT.DEMAND_CLEAN" Uncore: "UNC_CBO_XSNP_RESPONSE.INVAL_M" "UNC_CBO_CACHE_LOOKUP.ES" For all of them, I get error like this: # pmcstat -p L2_RQSTS.MISS ls pmcstat: ERROR: Cannot allocate process-mode pmc with specification "L2_RQSTS.MISS": Invalid argument Box does not panic or anything. I've tried to double check my changes without success. Is it possible that the documentation has some inconsistencies? Cheers, HirenReceived on Sat Mar 23 2013 - 00:05:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC