Re: Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?

From: Scott Long <scottl_at_samsco.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:29:24 -0600
On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote:

> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
> 

From a code execution standpoint?  No, it's not.

> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.
> 

From a code segment size standpoint, there's definitely some stuff that should be
made modular and optional.

Scott
Received on Thu Mar 28 2013 - 14:29:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC