Re: [RFC] vfs.read_min proposal

From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:38:46 +0300
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:57:48PM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think this is definitely a feature that should be set by a flag to
> > either file descriptor used for aio_read, or aio_read call itself.
> > Adding a flag to aio_read() might be cumbersome from the ABI perspective.
> 
> something along the lines of ioctl(F_READAHEAD)/f_seqcount might be
> acceptable, dont you think?
This is exactly what I talked about starting from the first response.
aio_read proposal is some (not-neccessary) refinement.

Received on Sun Mar 31 2013 - 09:38:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC