Re: panic: in_pcblookup_local (?)

Peter Wemm wrote:
> >> > offending revision.
> >>
> >> I've started a binary search.  I'll let you know what that turns up.
> >
> > Thanks, and sorry for getting my Ian's mixed up. :-/
> >
> > --
> > John Baldwin
> 
> There's been two separate machines, at least twice each on this exact
> panic / trace.  Always with doing a 'svn update'.
> 
> Rolling back to April 5th 249172 solves it.  (There's nothing
> particular about that rev, except it was top-of-tree when the last
> update was done).
> 
> I see a number locking changes in the area.  Note that this is UDP,
> most likely a dns lookup.

I'll work to confirm this here.  I was a little slow in bisecting
because I spent 2 days trying to figure out what revision caused
PF to rapidly expire its entire state table which prevented testing
this condition.

Ian

-- 
Ian Freislich