Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox

From: Boris Bobrov <breton_at_cynicmansion.ru>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:06:08 +0400
В сообщении от Thursday 31 of October 2013 17:54:32 Gleb написал:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 05:48:43PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> T> B> 1. The bug disappeares if I disable VT-x/AMD-V in my virtual
> machine T> B> settings (Settings -> System -> Acceleration) and
> appeares if I enable it T> B> (thanks to Gleb for inspiration
> yesterday). It disappeares everywhere, on T> B> all revisions.
> T> B>
> T> B> 2. r244315 seems to be not buggy even with VT-x enabled. So we
> have to T> B> look somewhere between r244315 and r248935.
> T>
> T> Good news! Thanks Boris.
> T>
> T> Can you track this down to a particular revision?
> 
> I have suspision that it is very close to the bhyve checkin:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - r245652 | neel | 2013-01-19 08:18:52 +0400 (сб, 19 янв 2013) | 9
> lines
> 
> Merge projects/bhyve to head.
> 
> 'bhyve' was developed by grehan_at_ and myself at NetApp (thanks!).
> 
> Special thanks to Peter Snyder, Joe Caradonna and Michael Dexter for
> their support and encouragement.
> 
> Obtained from:  NetApp
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> 
> since this is the code that started to utilize VT-x.
> 
> Can you please check this revision and -1 revision to it?

r245652 is not buggy.

-- 
С наилучшими пожеланиями, 
Boris

Received on Sat Nov 02 2013 - 06:06:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:43 UTC