Re: FreeBSD 10 Beta2 /etc/rc.d/named script and /etc/defaults/rc.conf

On 04 Nov 2013, at 09:34, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote:

>  [adding maintainer to Cc]
> 
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:41:01AM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote:
> G> > Am 03.11.2013 um 23:06 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff <glebius_at_FreeBSD.org>:
> G> >
> G> > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:05:02PM +0200, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> G> > > Ö> Altough bind removed from FreeBSD 10 distribution, "/etc/rc.d/named"
> G> > script
> G> > > Ö> still exists.
> G> > > Ö> and this script depends on "/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist" file but
> G> > there is
> G> > > Ö> no such file in source tree.
> G> > > Ö> I think this file was forgotten to be removed.
> G> > > Ö>
> G> > > Ö> And also, named_* definitions still exists in /etc/defaults/rc.conf
> G> > file.
> G> > >
> G> > > Please review attached file that removes named from /etc.
> G> >
> G> > It would be great if the port would learn to install its own script etc.
> G> > in time for that change. (Unless it’s already there, and I’m just too blind
> G> > to see it.)
> G> 
> G> No you are not blind. Installing bind from ports still relies on the
> G> /etc/rc.d/named script.
> 
> Erwin, can you please handle that?

Things are much worse that this, the ports are completely written under the assumption that there is a Bind in base, which of course would already break with WITHOUT_BIND before Bind was completely removed.  It will be hard to fix without breaking the installed base of 8 and 9.  Sigh.

I'll try to work on it this week, but unfortunately have a full schedule of meetings and travel as well.

Erwin