On 23.11.2013 12:12, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Andrey, > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:07:35PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > A> There is a problem in recent -current to build ipfw with WITHOUT_PF > A> option, introduced in r257215. altq.c file produce error due to included > A> <net/pfvar.h> have following includes > A> > A> #include <netpfil/pf/pf.h> > A> #include <netpfil/pf/pf_altq.h> > A> #include <netpfil/pf/pf_mtag.h> > A> > A> and netpfil/pf directory is empty in > A> /usr/src/include/Makefile with WITHOUT_PF option. > > The quick solution would be to make ipfw lose some functionality if > PF is cut away from system. > > The proper solution would be to make ALTQ configurable w/o pfctl. > How it was handled previously? F.e. ipfw in -stable 9 builds normally with WITHOUT_PF and have pfvar.h included too, but old pfvar.h have only <net/pf_mtag.h> which is available with WITHOUT_PF. By a first glance, alternative altq.c file with the same functions declared, but does nothing will be solution, replacing original when MK_PF is no.Received on Sat Nov 23 2013 - 07:20:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:44 UTC