Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

From: Nakata Maho <maho.nakata_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:25:40 +0900 (JST)
Hmm thanks for discussion.
I'll install and test FBSD 10 in this weekend.
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:43:02 -0800

> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>> On 11/14/2013 15:45, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> > 
>> > And in practice, it is broken.
>> > 
>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-November/046565.html
>> > 
>> > QED
>> 
>> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
>> anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard
>> options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with:
>> 
>> env LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc++.so.1 octave
>> 
> 
> Unfortunately, you need to add "USE_GCC=any" to math/octave/Makefile,
> and rebuild it.  You theni need to run "ldd -a | more" and search for
> shared libraries that are linked against both libc++ and libstdc++.
> Then, add "USE_GCC=any" to those ports' Makefile and recompile.
> I recall at least 4 that needed to be rebuilt, but only remember
> fltk and libgraphite2.
> 
> -- 
> Steve
> 
Received on Thu Nov 28 2013 - 03:25:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:44 UTC