Re: rcs is gone?

Hi!

Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
earlier in the development process.

If everyone who communicates says "x" and no-one says anything about the
other letters "a"->"w", "y", "z", then we as developers don't really have a
good cross-section of what people actually need.

If you truely are doing things that require this level of service(s), then
I encourage you to contact the FreeBSD Foundation and communicate exactly
what your requirements are and why. They'll be able to steer things.

Thanks!


-adrian



On 7 October 2013 16:00, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon_at_orthanc.ca> wrote:

>
> On 2013-10-07, at 3:45 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon_at_orthanc.ca> wrote:
>
> > Having RCS in the base system is very useful.  We use it to track
> changes to bits of /etc on the machines where we don't do wholesale
> customizations.  (Those ones get git, but they also get an install of
> /usr/ports with a fully populated /usr/ports/distfiles.)
>
> To clarify, the git-enabled machines are a small isolated subset of the
> development machines.  Then comes the test and q/a environment, where we
> (by contract) roll nothing beyond the base OS and our application software.
>
> There are other development shops dealing with the same restrictions.
>  Most of them have to stay quiet about these requirements on account of the
> Homeland Security.  They are all getting buggered over by the fallacy that
> everyone has a gigabit ethernet connection permanently wired into their ass
> ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>