On 10/9/13 7:22 AM, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote: >> On 10/8/13 4:33 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: >>> In message <52542687.7000100_at_pix.net>, Kurt Lidl writes: >>>> On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>> On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: >>>>>>> Hey all, > Did it this morning > > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~db/rcs.tgz > > Or > > http://www.db.net/~db/rcs.tgz > > > It's up to core_at_ to decide what to do. > > > - Diane I think everyone knows my opinion.. I think we need an in-base *file* versioning tool .. and since many of us have RCS'd our /etc files, or have install scripts that use RCS it should be RCS.. I don't care WHICH RCS it is but it needs to be back in place by 10. and the easiest way of having it there in the mean while is jsut to revert the commit until the new one is ready.Received on Wed Oct 09 2013 - 12:00:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:42 UTC