Re: 10.0-BETA1 ZFS install -- /var/empty read-only

From: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:29:59 +0300
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Eric van Gyzen <eric_at_vangyzen.net> wrote:
> I just installed 10.0-BETA1 using the [very cool] new automatic ZFS
> option.  I noticed that /var/empty is not mounted read-only.  I suspect
> it could be.  I made it so, and sshd still seemed to work.
>
> Eric

I don't think there's a standard for how to break down the ZFS pool to
individual datasets. If the install made only a single dataset for
/var you would then effectively get a read-write /var/empty. The
applies if you install on UFS and don't assign a separate filesystem
for /var/empty like the default install does in fact.

-Kimmo
Received on Wed Oct 23 2013 - 11:30:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:43 UTC