Re: CUREENT issue with ballon.c

From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau_at_citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 23:17:59 +0100
On 24/10/13 22:15, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:45:20PM +0100, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
>> On 24/10/13 13:01, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Roger Pau Monn? <roger.pau_at_citrix.com
>>> <mailto:roger.pau_at_citrix.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On 24/10/13 03:02, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>>     > --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xfffffe00002c6b70, rbp = 0 ---
>>>     > uma_zalloc_arg: zone "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
>>>     > exclusive sleep mutex balloon_lock (balloon_lock) r = 0
>>>     > (0xffffffff816e9c58) locked _at_
>>>     /usr/src/sys/dev/xen/balloon/balloon.c:339
>>>     > exclusive sleep mutex balloon_mutex (balloon_mutex) r = 0
>>>     > (0xffffffff816e9c38) locked _at_
>>>     /usr/src/sys/dev/xen/balloon/balloon.c:373
>>>     > KDB: stack backtrace:
>>>     > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
>>>     > 0xfffffe00002c67c0
>>>     > kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfffffe00002c6870
>>>     > witness_warn() at witness_warn+0x4a8/frame 0xfffffe00002c6930
>>>     > uma_zalloc_arg() at uma_zalloc_arg+0x3b/frame 0xfffffe00002c69a0
>>>     > malloc() at malloc+0x101/frame 0xfffffe00002c69f0
>>>     > balloon_process() at balloon_process+0x44a/frame 0xfffffe00002c6a70
>>>     > fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x84/frame 0xfffffe00002c6ab0
>>>     > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe00002c6ab0
>>>     > --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xfffffe00002c6b70, rbp = 0 ---
>>>     > uma_zalloc_arg: zone "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
>>>     > exclusive sleep mutex balloon_lock (balloon_lock) r = 0
>>>     > (0xffffffff816e9c58) locked _at_
>>>     /usr/src/sys/dev/xen/balloon/balloon.c:339
>>>     > exclusive sleep mutex balloon_mutex (balloon_mutex) r = 0
>>>     > (0xffffffff816e9c38) locked _at_
>>>     /usr/src/sys/dev/xen/balloon/balloon.c:373
>>>     > KDB: stack backtrace:
>>>     > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
>>>     > 0xfffffe00002c67c0
>>>     > kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfffffe00002c6870
>>>     > witness_warn() at witness_warn+0x4a8/frame 0xfffffe00002c6930
>>>     > uma_zalloc_arg() at uma_zalloc_arg+0x3b/frame 0xfffffe00002c69a0
>>>     > malloc() at malloc+0x101/frame 0xfffffe00002c69f0
>>>     > balloon_process() at balloon_process+0x44a/frame 0xfffffe00002c6a70
>>>     > fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x84/frame 0xfffffe00002c6ab0
>>>     > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe00002c6ab0
>>>     > --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xfffffe00002c6b70, rbp = 0 ---
>>>     > uma_zalloc_arg: zone "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
>>>
>>>     Did you do anything specific to trigger the crash? Can you explain the
>>>     steps needed to reproduce it?
>>>
>>>
>>> just recompiled a kernel, and booted it scrolls continuously across the
>>> screen
>>> doesnt seem to ever stop. 
>>
>> I've tried r257051 and it seems to work fine, could you please post your
>> Xen version, the config file used to launch the VM and the toolstack used?
> 
> Do you have witness enabled in your kernel config ?

Yes, but I'm not touching balloon memory target.

> There is an obvious case of calling malloc(M_WAITOK) while holding both
> balloon_lock and balloon_mutex:
> ballon_process->decrease_reservation->balloon_append.

Yes, I'm aware of that, it's just that it shouldn't happen unless you
actually trigger a balloon memory decrease, which should not happen
automatically AFAIK, that's why I was asking if this was happening
without the user specifically requesting it.

Anyway, this should be clearly fixed and pulled into 10 no matter what
triggered it. I will send a patch as soon as possible.
Received on Thu Oct 24 2013 - 20:18:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:43 UTC