On 2013-10-28 14:16, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:45:02AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: > >> On Oct 28, 2013, at 2:28 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> >>> I can be wrong. >>> As I see ZFS cretate seperate thread for earch txg writing. >>> Also for writing to L2ARC. >>> As result -- up to several thousands threads created and destoyed per >>> second. And hundreds thousands page allocations, zeroing, maping >>> unmaping and freeing per seconds. Very high overhead. >>> >>> In systat -vmstat I see totfr up to 600000, prcfr up to 200000. >>> >>> Estimated overhead -- 30% of system time. >>> >>> Can anybody implement thread and page pool for txg? >> Would lowering vfs.zfs.txg.timeout be a way to tame or mitigate this? > vfs.zfs.txg.timeout: 5 > > Only x5 lowering (less in real case with burst writing). And more fragmentation on writing and etc. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >From my understanding, increasing the timeout so you are doing fewer transaction groups, would actually be the way to increase performance, at the cost of 'bursty' writing and the associated uneven latency. -- Allan JudeReceived on Mon Oct 28 2013 - 17:27:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:43 UTC