Re: clang+libc++ using missing powl

On Sep 5, 2013, at 00:38, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> I'm running exp-run to build the whole ports tree with clang using libc++ by
> default.
> 
> As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about:
> undefined reference to `powl'
> 
> It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet in libm, am I
> missing something?


Do you have a concrete example of a port that gives this result?  We do
have powl these days, but maybe some configure script is trying to be
smart and does not pass -lm to the linker flags...

-Dimitry