On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:24:05 +0300 Ivan Klymenko <fidaj_at_ukr.net> wrote: > В Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:17:13 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> пишет: > > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:02:37 +0300 > > Ivan Klymenko <fidaj_at_ukr.net> wrote: > > > > > В Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:37:48 +0200 > > > "O. Hartmann" <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> пишет: > > > > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.2.18/out/freebsd.amd64/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/alloc-r0drv-freebsd.c:83:76: > > > > error: too few arguments to function call, expected 10, have 9 > > > > cbAllocated, TRUE, VM_PROT_ALL, VM_PROT_ALL, 0); ^ > > > > _at_/vm/vm_map.h:368:1: note: 'vm_map_find' declared here int > > > > vm_map_find(vm_map_t, vm_object_t, vm_ooffset_t, vm_offset_t *, > > > > vm_size_t, > > > > > > Try the following changes: > > > int rc = vm_map_find(kernel_map, pVmObject, 0, &Addr, > > > --- cbAllocated, TRUE, VM_PROT_ALL, > > > VM_PROT_ALL, 0); +++ cbAllocated, 0, > > > VMFS_OPTIMAL_SPACE, VM_PROT_ALL, VM_PROT_ALL, 0); > > > > > > for Nvidia driver need to make similar changes... > > The man page of vm_map_find() says the last parameter is of int, > > named int cow. On the hurry, I didn't find any explanation of that > > parameter. Setting it to "0" (zero) also in the nvidia_subr.c makes > > the driver compile again. > > > > But simply filling in a int zero is a bit strange without knowing > > what to do, isn't it? > > > > Thanks anyway, > > > > Oliver > > This commit you to find an appropriate example ... > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=291456+0+current/svn-src-head > And in this case, the driver Nvidia really need to specify 0 in place > of the sixth argument ... > but I'm not sure at 100% :) I have a patch attached for the x11/nvidia-driver Makefile. It doesn't work and I loose hairs due to not knowing why. When issuing the following command sequence on the console: cd /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver make clean extract sed -i -e '/(VM_PROT_READ | VM_PROT_WRITE), 0);$/s/0);$/0, 0);/g' \ work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-325.15/src/nvidia_subr.c and check then line 835 (the corrupt one) in file work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-325.15/src/nvidia_subr.c, I see this BEFORE: status = vm_map_find(kernel_map, at->object, (i * PAGE_SIZE), &virtual_address, size, VMFS_ANY_SPACE, (VM_PROT_READ | VM_PROT_WRITE), ===(835)>> (VM_PROT_READ | VM_PROT_WRITE), 0); and I see this AFTER the sed'ed replacement: status = vm_map_find(kernel_map, at->object, (i * PAGE_SIZE), &virtual_address, size, VMFS_ANY_SPACE, (VM_PROT_READ | VM_PROT_WRITE), ===(835)>> (VM_PROT_READ | VM_PROT_WRITE), 0, 0); BUT: Using the patch (see attached, please apply to x11/nvidia-driver/Makefile) gives me an error in x11/nvidia-driver: make clean patch ===> Cleaning for nvidia-driver-325.15 ===> License NVIDIA accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for nvidia-driver-325.08_1 ===> nvidia-driver-325.15 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by nvidia-driver-325.15 for building ===> Extracting for nvidia-driver-325.15 => SHA256 Checksum OK for NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-325.15.tar.gz. ===> Patching for nvidia-driver-325.15 sed: 1: "/(VM_PROT_READ | VM_PRO ...": invalid command code 0 *** Error code 1 The Shell/make should be able to substitute within a single-quotet command to sed, but the error message reports differently. Do not be confused about the driver revision I use. I tried the official one (319.XX) as well and it is not working the very same way and the patch won't either. Oliver
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC