On Sep 17, 2013 4:31 PM, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 17 September 2013 16:22, Ian Lepore <ian_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 14:56 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > ... I'd rather see if we can actually separate out things some more so > > > these builds can shrink. > > > > > > Eg, if there's malloc related functions that aren't used, maybe we should > > > break malloc down into a directory full of functions. > > > > > > > Why is that better than using this automated solution? > > > > Not everyone is going to run clang on their target development platform? :-) > > Personally I'd rather structure my work to behave better instead of doing > something that relies on a specific tool/suite to be able to optimise. > Gcc also supports this. I used it when generating builds with newlib for microcontrollers at a previous job. -JustinReceived on Tue Sep 17 2013 - 22:07:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC