On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:11:50 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:57:35PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote: >> We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus >> rendering the port superfluous. >> >> Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need >> the port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite >> happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1. >> >> > libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it > should be a change that doesn't require any manual operations. > Ah, right. Thanks. Then I can safely do as I already have; i.e. remove the libexecinfo package and recompile those affected. This on the grounds that the fewer unnecessary ports the better, imho.Received on Wed Sep 18 2013 - 15:56:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC