Re: The right way to invoke sh from a freebsd makefile?

From: Glen Barber <gjb_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 19:27:10 -0400
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 05:18:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> What's the right way to launch the bourne shell from a makefile?  I had
> assumed the ${SHELL} variable would be set to "the right" copy
> of /bin/sh (like maybe the one in tmp or legacy at various stages).  It
> appears that that's not the case, and ${SHELL} is whatever comes from
> the environment, which can lead to using csh or bash or whatever.
> 
> I see some of our makefiles use just a bare "sh" which seems reasonable
> to me, but I don't want to glitch this in src/include/Makefile again.
> The goal is to run a script in src/include/Makefile by launching sh with
> the script name (as opposed to launching the script and letting the #!
> do its thing, which doesn't work if the source dir is mounted noexec).
> 

I think BUILDENV_SHELL is what you are looking for.  For this specific
case, I think instead of '#!/bin/sh', maybe '#!/usr/bin/env sh' may be
preferable.

Glen


Received on Sun Sep 22 2013 - 21:27:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC