Re: static linking, libc multiple definitions

From: Sean Bruno <sbruno_at_ignoranthack.me>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 09:44:43 -0700
On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 17:12 +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> It looks like these two are defined in rpc_com.h, so they are declared and defined in multiple compilation units.  That's not actually wrong (they'll have common linkage and be merged), but it's discouraged because it can mask other errors.  Can you see if this patch fixes it for you?
> 
> David
> 
> 
> Index: rpc/rpc_com.h
> ===================================================================
> --- rpc/rpc_com.h       (revision 264068)
> +++ rpc/rpc_com.h       (working copy)
> _at__at_ -86,8 +86,8 _at__at_
>  bool_t __xdrrec_getrec(XDR *, enum xprt_stat *, bool_t);
>  void __xprt_unregister_unlocked(SVCXPRT *);
>  
> -SVCXPRT **__svc_xports;
> -int __svc_maxrec;
> +extern SVCXPRT **__svc_xports;
> +extern int __svc_maxrec;
>  
>  __END_DECLS
>  
> Index: rpc/svc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- rpc/svc.c   (revision 264068)
> +++ rpc/svc.c   (working copy)
> _at__at_ -84,6 +84,9 _at__at_
>         void                (*sc_dispatch)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *);
>  } *svc_head;
>  
> +SVCXPRT **__svc_xports;
> +int __svc_maxrec;
> +
>  static struct svc_callout *svc_find(rpcprog_t, rpcvers_t,
>      struct svc_callout **, char *);
>  static void __xprt_do_unregister (SVCXPRT *xprt, bool_t dolock);
> 
> 


Yep, that make it much quieter now.  :-)  Thank you.

sean

Received on Sun Apr 06 2014 - 14:44:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:48 UTC