On 05/12/2014 13:07, Borja Marcos wrote: > On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: > >> On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote: >>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >>> >>>> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij_at_) who has worked with >>>> folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best person to >>>> review this. >>> Hi, >>> >>> Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of these fixes have been applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As far as I know, the "oce" driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I managed to cause a panic reliably within 30 seconds. >> Was there any conclusion to this, current and releng/10.0 & releng/10.1 seem pretty similar with regards oce but a customer is reporting panics very similar to this thread. >> >> Did the commit of the additional locking never make it in? > Not as far as I know. I´ve updated a couple of machines here to 10-STABLE and I've been applying the patch manually myself. > > I don't think it's been applied even to -HEAD. > > For now I've told my coworkers to avoid Emulex cards whenever possible. As far as I know the driver is unusable in its present state. Thanks for the quick reply Borja, review of the patch is now up: /https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1269 Hopefully we can get this in the tree and make oce usable moving forward. Regards Steve /Received on Fri Dec 05 2014 - 13:01:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:54 UTC