Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

From: Matthew Grooms <mgrooms_at_shrew.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:45:54 -0600
On 12/9/2014 11:03 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu <neelnatu_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed.  Is there a
>>>> timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
>>>
>>> It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in
>>> mind.
>>>
>>> I'll guess that it'll be towards the end of November but can be
>>> accelerated if someone has a need for this in 10-STABLE sooner.
>>
>> I would be using such a patch as soon as it was available.  On a friend's
>> advice, I upgraded a ZFS server here at home with an AMD 9590 and 32Gig of
>> RAM.  I'd dearly like to use it to track down the netgraph bug (see my
>> other recent posts), but it doesn't currently qualify.
>
> Ping? I'm also waiting with bated breath for this to be MFCed. :) Thanks for the great work!
>

+1. And on a somewhat related note, does the SVM port have equivalent to 
Intel Unrestricted Guest support? From what I understand, that will be 
required for the forthcoming UEFI/CSM ( Legacy BIOS ) as well as other 
bhyve features.

Thanks,

-Matthew
Received on Tue Dec 09 2014 - 17:13:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:54 UTC