On 24/02/2014 10:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <530B2500.5030608_at_rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes: > >> Can I also suggest that ntp.org shouldn't be in the base either? :P > > I absolutely agree, but the replacement is less clear in that case. > > I'd suggest openntpd as a candidate as it would require less work than dntpd since that has some kernel changes. At ~400K it is pretty lightweight and doesn't listen at all by default, suitable as a default ntpd that just maintains time - one can always install ntp.org from ports should they need more features (such as access control and monlist, etc)Received on Mon Feb 24 2014 - 10:04:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC