On 24/02/2014 11:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:04:48AM +0000, Joe Holden wrote: >> On 24/02/2014 10:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> In message <530B2500.5030608_at_rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes: >>> >>>> Can I also suggest that ntp.org shouldn't be in the base either? :P >>> >>> I absolutely agree, but the replacement is less clear in that case. >>> >>> >> I'd suggest openntpd as a candidate as it would require less work than >> dntpd since that has some kernel changes. >> >> At ~400K it is pretty lightweight and doesn't listen at all by default, >> suitable as a default ntpd that just maintains time - one can always >> install ntp.org from ports should they need more features (such as >> access control and monlist, etc) > > openntpd not able to authenticate the sources it is using and thus lack a big > ntp feature as a client. > > regards, > Bapt > hm, I can't say I have noticed this as being a problem where I've used it, are there any scenarios where this is a showstopper?Received on Mon Feb 24 2014 - 10:13:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC