On 14/01/14 17:14, Julien Grall wrote: > On 01/14/2014 04:08 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On 14/01/14 16:41, Julien Grall wrote: >>> On 01/14/2014 02:59 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >>>> +static int >>>> +xenpv_attach(device_t dev) >>>> +{ >>>> + device_t child; >>>> + >>>> + if (xen_hvm_domain()) { >>>> + device_t xenpci; >>>> + devclass_t dc; >>>> + >>>> + /* Make sure xenpci has been attached */ >>>> + dc = devclass_find("xenpci"); >>>> + if (dc == NULL) >>>> + panic("unable to find xenpci devclass"); >>>> + >>>> + xenpci = devclass_get_device(dc, 0); >>>> + if (xenpci == NULL) >>>> + panic("unable to find xenpci device"); >>>> + >>>> + if (!device_is_attached(xenpci)) >>>> + panic("trying to attach xenpv before xenpci"); >>>> + } >>> >>> Can you use the identify method to add the xenpci device? >> >> I don't think so, xenpci is a pci device, it is detected and plugged by >> the pci bus code. > > Oups, I though you are trying to add the device. In this case, the check > seems pointless. In which case the xenpci couldn't exist? It's just a "belt and suspenders", if we attach the xenpv bus without xenpci being attached first a bunch of things are going to fail, I though it might be best to print a clear error message about what went wrong in order to help debug it.Received on Tue Jan 14 2014 - 15:20:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:46 UTC