Wiadomość napisana przez Mark Felder w dniu 16 sty 2014, o godz. 21:36: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014, at 23:11, Tim Kientzle wrote: >> >> On Jan 14, 2014, at 6:47 AM, Mark Felder <feld_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> I was recently talking to someone about how one would backup / restore >>> ACLs reliably. I didn't see any mention of ACLs in the mtree man page >>> and after a quick google I came upon this old mailing list post: >>> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-April/024173.html >>> >>> patch in list is here: http://heka.cenkes.org/sat/diffs/mtree_acl.diff >>> I've mirrored it here: https://feld.me/freebsd/mtree_acl.diff >>> >>> This old patch appears to still apply cleanly. I hate to see a patch die >>> and be forgotten. >> >> One problem that ‘tar’ has addressed (inspired by Joerg Schilling’s >> work on star) is to permit ACLs to be restored even if the user database >> is out of date. >> >> This is done by including a fourth field in each ACE with the >> numeric user ID. >> >> I suspect you want to do the same for mtree. I thought >> I remembered acl_to_text having an option to use >> an extended text format, so it might be a trivial change. >> > > As long as it's not default. One of the most convenient ways to change a > user's UID (or multiple users!) is to do an mtree backup, change > UID/GID, and then re-apply mtree backup. Every file that the user(s) > previously owned will be automatically changed to the new UID/GID for > you :-) I don't think the functionality above would interfere with that in any way. The owner entries ("user:" for POSIX, "owner_at_" for NFSv4 ACLs) are stored in a different way, and they never have the appended ID. (Besides, why not just "find ./ -user XXX -print0 | xargs -0 chown YYY"?) -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body?Received on Thu Jan 16 2014 - 21:09:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:46 UTC