Re: Regression on 10-RC5 with a multicast routing daemon

From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:33:59 +0400
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 02:42:32AM +0100, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
O> >   Olivier,
O> >
O> >
O> > TL;DR version: you need not subtract iphdrlen in 10.0. Code in
O> > igmp.c:accept_igmp()
O> > should be smth like:
O> >
O> >     iphdrlen  = ip->ip_hl << 2;
O> > #ifdef RAW_INPUT_IS_RAW /* Linux */
O> >     ipdatalen = ntohs(ip->ip_len) - iphdrlen;
O> > #else
O> >  #if __FreeBSD_version >= 1000000
O> >     ipdatalen = ip->ip_len - iphdrlen;
O> >  #else
O> >     ipdatalen = ip->ip_len;
O> >  #endif
O> > #endif
O> >
O> >
O> With this patch I've no more the message "warning - Received packet from
O> x.x.x.x shorter (28 bytes) than hdr+data length (20+28)":Thanks!
O> But there is still a regression regarding the PIM socket behavior not
O> related to the packet format.
O> The pim.c include 2 functions (pim_read and pim_accept) that are called
O> when the socket received a packet: There functions are never triggered when
O> PIM packets are received on 10.0.
O> In the same time igmp_read() and igmp_accept() are correctly triggered on
O> 9.2 and 10.0.
O> tcpdump in non-promiscious mode correctly see input of PIM packet: This
O> should confirm that once this daemon is started, it correctly open a PIM
O> socket and the multicast filter is updated.

Can you please try this patch to kernel?

If it doesn't work, can you please gather ktr(4) information with KTR_IPMF
compiled into kernel.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.

Received on Tue Jan 21 2014 - 12:34:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:46 UTC