Am Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:23:14 +0200 Willem Jan Withagen <wjw_at_digiware.nl> schrieb: > On 2014-07-01 16:48, Rang, Anton wrote: > > DOT => DOD > > > > 444F54 => 444F44 > > > > That's a single-bit flip. Bad memory, perhaps? > > Very likely, especially if the system does not have ECC.... > It just happens on rare occasions that a alpha particle, power cycle, or > any things else disruptive damages a memory cell. And it could be that > it requires a special pattern of accesses to actually exhibit the error. > > In the past (199x's) 'make buildworld' used to be a rather good memory > tester. But nowadays look at > http://www.memtest.org/ > > This tool has found all of the bad memory in all the systems I used and > or build for others... > Note that it might take a few runs and some more heat to actually > trigger the faulty cell, but memtest86 will usually find it. > > Note that on big systems with lots of memory it can take a loooooong > time to run just one full testset to completion. > > --WjW I already testet via memtest86+ (had to download the linux image, the port on FreeBSD is broken on CURRENT). It didn't find anything strange so far. I will do another test. I realised, that on that that specific box, the chipset temperature is 81 Grad Celius. The chipset is a Eaglelake P45 - in which the memory controller resides on that old platform. dmidecode gives: Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC. Product Name: P5Q-WS Version: Rev 1.xx > > > > > > Anton > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On > > Behalf Of O. Hartmann Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 8:08 AM > > To: Dimitry Andric > > Cc: Adrian Chadd; FreeBSD CURRENT > > Subject: Re: [CURRENT]: weird memory/linker problem? > > > > Am Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:22:25 +0200 > > Dimitry Andric <dim_at_FreeBSD.org> schrieb: > > > >> On 23 Jun 2014, at 16:31, O. Hartmann <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >>> Am Sun, 22 Jun 2014 10:10:04 -0700 > >>> Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> schrieb: > >>>> When they segfault, where do they segfault? > >> ... > >>> GIMP, LaTeX work, nothing special, but a bit memory consuming > >>> regrading GIMP) I tried updating the ports tree and surprisingly the > >>> tree is left over in a unclean condition while /usr/bin/svn segfault > >>> (on console: pid 18013 (svn), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)). > >>> > >>> Using /usr/local/bin/svn, which is from the devel/subversion port, > >>> performs well, while FreeBSD 11's svn contribution dies as described. It did not > >>> hours ago! > >> > >> I think what Adrian meant was: can you run svn (or another crashing > >> program) in gdb, and post a backtrace? Or maybe run ktrace, and see > >> where it dies? > >> > >> Alternatively, put a core dump and the executable (with debug info) in > >> a tarball, and upload it somewhere, so somebody else can analyze it. > >> > >> -Dimitry > >> > > > > It's me again, with the same weird story. > > > > After a couple of days silence, the mysterious entity in my computer is back. This > > time it is again a weird compiler message of failure (trying to buildworld): > > > > [...] > > c++ -O2 -pipe -O3 -O3 > > c++ -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include > > -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include > > -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support -I. > > -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include > > -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS > > -fno-strict-aliasing -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0\" > > -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" > > -Qunused-arguments -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include -std=c++11 > > -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wno-c++11-extensions > > -c /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/Host.cpp -o > > Host.o --- GraphWriter.o --- In file included > > from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/GraphWriter.cpp:14: /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/GraphWriter.h:269:10: > > error: use of undeclared identifier 'DOD'; did you mean 'DOT'? O << > > DOD::EscapeString(Label); ^~~ > > DOT /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/GraphWriter.h:35:11: > > note: 'DOT' declared here namespace DOT { // Private functions... ^ 1 error > > generated. *** [GraphWriter.o] Error code 1 > > > > > > Well, in the past I saw many of those messages, especially not found labels of > > routines in shared objects/libraries or even those "funny" misspelled messages shown > > above. > > > > I can not reproduce them after a reboot, but as long as the system is running with > > this error occured, it is sticky. So in order to compile the OS successfully, I > > reboot. > > > > Does anyone have an idea what this could be? Since it affects at the moment only one > > machine (the other CoreDuo has been retired in the meanwhile), it feels a bit like a > > miscompilation on a certain type of CPU. > > > > Thanks for your patience, > > > > Oliver > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:50 UTC