On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > [moving discussion to freebsd-current_at_] > On 06/27/14 15:23, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:57:54PM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > >> Author: delphij > >> Date: Fri Jun 27 19:57:54 2014 > >> New Revision: 267977 > >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/267977 > >> Log: > >> Always set UF_ARCHIVE on target (because they are by definition new files > >> and should be archived) and ignore error when we can't set it (e.g. NFS). > >> Reviewed by: ken > >> MFC after: 2 weeks > >> Modified: > >> head/bin/mv/mv.c > >> Modified: head/bin/mv/mv.c > >> ============================================================================== > >> --- head/bin/mv/mv.c Fri Jun 27 19:50:30 2014 (r267976) > >> +++ head/bin/mv/mv.c Fri Jun 27 19:57:54 2014 (r267977) > >> _at__at_ -337,8 +337,8 _at__at_ err: if (unlink(to)) > >> * on a file that we copied, i.e., that we didn't create.) > >> */ > >> errno = 0; > >> - if (fchflags(to_fd, sbp->st_flags)) > >> - if (errno != EOPNOTSUPP || sbp->st_flags != 0) > >> + if (fchflags(to_fd, sbp->st_flags | UF_ARCHIVE)) > >> + if (errno != EOPNOTSUPP || ((sbp->st_flags & ~UF_ARCHIVE) != 0)) > >> warn("%s: set flags (was: 0%07o)", to, sbp->st_flags); > >> > >> tval[0].tv_sec = sbp->st_atime; > > The part ignoring failures to set UF_ARCHIVE is OK. However, it seems > > inconsistent to set UF_ARCHIVE on a cross-filesystem mv of a single > > file, but not on a cross-filesystem mv of a directory tree or a file > > newly created via shell output redirection. > > If UF_ARCHIVE is supposed to be set automatically, I think this should > > be done in the kernel, like msdosfs already does. However, I'm not sure > > this is actually a useful feature: backup programs are smarter than an > > archive attribute these days. > The flag is supposed to be set automatically (as my understanding of the > ZFS portion of implementation). OK, I did not know that ZFS set UF_ARCHIVE automatically. If so, blindly copying st_flags like the old code did is indeed suboptimal. > However in order to implement that way, we will have to stat() the > target file (attached). Personally, I think this is a little bit > wasteful, but it would probably something that we have to do if we > implement a switch to turn off automatic UF_ARCHIVE behavior. This seems better. For example, it avoids UF_ARCHIVE spreading around randomly on UFS. Nits: the errno = 0 assignment seems unnecessary, "can not" should be "cannot". > Index: bin/mv/mv.c > =================================================================== > --- bin/mv/mv.c (revision 267984) > +++ bin/mv/mv.c (working copy) > _at__at_ -278,6 +278,7 _at__at_ fastcopy(const char *from, const char *to, struct > static char *bp = NULL; > mode_t oldmode; > int nread, from_fd, to_fd; > + struct stat to_sb; > > if ((from_fd = open(from, O_RDONLY, 0)) < 0) { > warn("fastcopy: open() failed (from): %s", from); > _at__at_ -329,6 +330,7 _at__at_ err: if (unlink(to)) > */ > preserve_fd_acls(from_fd, to_fd, from, to); > (void)close(from_fd); > + > /* > * XXX > * NFS doesn't support chflags; ignore errors unless there's reason > _at__at_ -336,10 +338,19 _at__at_ err: if (unlink(to)) > * if the server supports flags and we were trying to *remove* flags > * on a file that we copied, i.e., that we didn't create.) > */ > - errno = 0; > - if (fchflags(to_fd, sbp->st_flags | UF_ARCHIVE)) > - if (errno != EOPNOTSUPP || ((sbp->st_flags & ~UF_ARCHIVE) != 0)) > - warn("%s: set flags (was: 0%07o)", to, sbp->st_flags); > + if (fstat(to_fd, &to_sb) == 0) { > + if ((sbp->st_flags & ~UF_ARCHIVE) != > + (to_sb.st_flags & ~UF_ARCHIVE)) { > + errno = 0; > + if (fchflags(to_fd, > + sbp->st_flags | (to_sb.st_flags & UF_ARCHIVE))) > + if (errno != EOPNOTSUPP || > + ((sbp->st_flags & ~UF_ARCHIVE) != 0)) > + warn("%s: set flags (was: 0%07o)", > + to, sbp->st_flags); > + } > + } else > + warn("%s: can not stat", to); > > tval[0].tv_sec = sbp->st_atime; > tval[1].tv_sec = sbp->st_mtime; -- Jilles TjoelkerReceived on Tue Jul 01 2014 - 19:35:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:50 UTC