2014-07-25 15:41, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:58:48AM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: >> Don't know, I'd guess some network-related memory limit is being hit >> on the sending site. >> >> Why not try to decouple the 'zfs send' from a network copy and ssh: >> Login to a remote side, do a 'zfs send' to some local temporary file >> there, then feed that file to ssh and send it over to a home host, >> where it can be piped into some simple program like md5 or 'wc -c' >> instead of a zfs recv. >> > I think I've done that, but it sort of defeats the purpose, Does it? If you are lucky it would fail again, but this time you'd know if it was a zfs or a network problem. > as the stream becomes a big file on disk. If it's an incremental stream and you have sufficient free space available, than it's all fine and you should try that. If storage is a problem you may try piping /dev/zero or /dev/random through ssh to feed a remote consumer, simulating a huge stream, and hope that it will eventually fail. > I'd like to get some help chasing what parameter(s) need to be fixed > here. [...] > Can I get some ideas on: > 1) what MIGHT need tweaking > 2) would (k|d)trace help? > 3) what else could we find out what's being told no memory? Sorry, not deep enough into fs or network to be able to tell. My guess it that it's a networking issue (not zfs), and not directly related to virtual memory or swap or ARC management. > To: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org, Freebsd fs <freebsd-fs_at_freebsd.org> If you'd be able to demonstrate that this is unrelated to zfs, then the freebsd-net_at_freebsd.org mailing list would perhaps be a suitable place to continue this thread. MarkReceived on Fri Jul 25 2014 - 14:04:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:51 UTC