Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

From: Darren Reed <darrenr_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:42:11 +1000
On 29/07/2014 8:07 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
...
> And all IPv6 NAT is evil and should be cast into (demonic residence
> of your choosing) on sight!

For the most part, I agree with you but the problem is "checkbox"
comparisons. That IPv6 shouldn't be NAT'd is why I didn't implement
it for such a long time.

However given the problem that EIDs pose for privacy, I'm of the
opinion that maybe NAT66 does have a place but not in the way that
the NAT66 RFC prescribes.

Darren
Received on Tue Jul 29 2014 - 07:42:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:51 UTC