On 30/07/2014 2:54 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > I would hope that is not the case. While NAT66 is "well known" and has been > a topic of discussion for years, NPT66 is relatively new. It does share > many concepts with NAT66 (and, most likely implementations also share > code), but does not require any state, making it vastly less complex and no > longer breaks point to point networking. The names look similar, which may > result in unfortunate confusion, but NPT66 may be the bast solution to a > real problem and it does not create the issues of NAT66. NPT66 is a subset of NAT66. Cheers, DarrenReceived on Thu Jul 31 2014 - 10:20:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:51 UTC