On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty <sjg_at_juniper.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >>Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >>FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >>10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >>host with bmake? > > You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in 10. > IIRC stable/9 has just enough bmake support to be able to build/install > bmake itself, so that ports can use it. > > I'm not sure how many people would appreciate making such changes to > stable/9 at this point. Most users would not care about building stable/9 on a stable/10 host. There are only a few people care about being able to do that. People who use poudriere to build a jail to build ports would care. People who are building products base on stable/9, but need to use a stable/10 (or newer) host would care, but that number of people is small. > >>I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so th >>at >>I can build ports inside the jail with poudriere. > > Why not use fmake in that scenario? That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake? If I typed "make something", is there a way inside the make environment to detect if bmake or fmake was invoked, and error out appropriately? -- CraigReceived on Tue Jun 17 2014 - 18:43:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:50 UTC