Re: UDP Lite support

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li <delphij_at_delphij.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit_at_gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li <delphij_at_delphij.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> > On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis
> >>>>> <brooks_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been
> >>>>>>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged
> >>>>>>> packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure
> >>>>>>> where to put this question. Apologies for the noise.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You've provided next to no context.  What is the
> >>>>>> question?  What thread are you referring to?  If this is
> >>>>>> the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more
> >>>>>> appropriate than -current.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- Brooks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on
> >>>>> freebsd-net. It has to do with an implementation of the
> >>>>> JACK server using UDP Lite for transferring data.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html
> >
> >  Looks
> >>>>>
> > like nobody proposed a patch?
> >
> > I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world
> > scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that
> > doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self
> > contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other
> > operating systems.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >>>
> >>
> >> https://github.com/torelizer/jack_trauma
> >>
> >> Not my project;  but, I want to port it to FreeBSD. First is to
> >> get it to build from source. Use  your raspberry pi with FreeBSD
> >> to broadcast your tunes and all.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to
> > improve the code.
>
> Kevin Lo have a patchset but needs someone to do performance testing
> (its impact on non-UDPLite applications), test with vimage, etc:
>
>         http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff
>         http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udp-v.diff
>
> Are you interested in working on these and report back?
>
> Cheers,
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTE4+mAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsthoQAIW67l7yDfIPvxDsNIWWJcRd
> 8brFYCAOPYE4LpuLGjtSgy370aBe9JmwAm41tE4qF0WhGpcu6TLsKjgMGWa/lHCc
> JId8+WBfbbQT8XJj/d+3oOETn5/rglvlRhJbnNIwaQpTXxuMC5oz2nGW7rIpIkaA
> OHo0D20DzGj4nxrQvijZ7DsMkk3F+KJu/4p7M6lpsIPCakknW1WD7IHRfbZ4Oldz
> 2xH4HfIk7cAdA7i/YUNjlpSgWFQ5OU03J5HAYfC6W37wiGbjdBYf/PKVhJ8hz7+D
> OCl+yCV00u4fCjlY6zXFea9pGr7Cl1P+sapwKDZ4g+NpNHxBUVY+ahbjQUHYON2W
> sdzAsLpMMqavCr1o8mcXdm7IPRlLUK9QZUySC9DitPvoF8G2llTAz1mWa4/Oj7/S
> JMiUERcaL5gdFN8EgEKkamFgLJguYquAjGtiowa51EMbnZG0Q2yWUcrEBFHWBEZT
> RW1u6r4ChIrPE9X5ljfFpQyKG6jFhYFXG+iVlgTB7F2ZWhjPAXi/tLbBnvIcci1m
> Md4XFm/bBJj/yNXdPuCi+CtvvdpZ/d4LQn4B7By5bIo1QjCb4Zx5n2Tq5xnYZUOI
> CnSVnNSkwLbbrAVtYOVWnrSuwR33JQnqeGHdM+XYBBwKBRhrx+ZgFWD7N6Gm95PU
> xXSxkgYVXI4sgi7Lh3Ia
> =2Vmc
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>


I have on patch file that Lo sent. Three different files are on it with the
assumption that the patch-root is /usr/src. I'm thinking about snipping it
twice and then applying each subpatch within the proper subdirectory.  Now,
this would not when Index:reference is at the header of each, right?