On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit_at_gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li <delphij_at_delphij.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> Hash: SHA512 >>>>> >>>>> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote: >>>>> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit_at_gmail.com> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li <delphij_at_delphij.net> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> > On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis >>>>> >>>>> <brooks_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been >>>>> >>>>>>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged >>>>> >>>>>>> packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure >>>>> >>>>>>> where to put this question. Apologies for the noise. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> You've provided next to no context. What is the >>>>> >>>>>> question? What thread are you referring to? If this is >>>>> >>>>>> the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more >>>>> >>>>>> appropriate than -current. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -- Brooks >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on >>>>> >>>>> freebsd-net. It has to do with an implementation of the >>>>> >>>>> JACK server using UDP Lite for transferring data. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html >>>>> > >>>>> > Looks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > like nobody proposed a patch? >>>>> > >>>>> > I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world >>>>> > scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that >>>>> > doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self >>>>> > contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other >>>>> > operating systems. >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://github.com/torelizer/jack_trauma >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Not my project; but, I want to port it to FreeBSD. First is to >>>>> >> get it to build from source. Use your raspberry pi with FreeBSD >>>>> >> to broadcast your tunes and all. >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to >>>>> > improve the code. >>>>> >>>>> Kevin Lo have a patchset but needs someone to do performance testing >>>>> (its impact on non-UDPLite applications), test with vimage, etc: >>>>> >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udp-v.diff >>>>> >>>>> Are you interested in working on these and report back? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> >>>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTE4+mAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsthoQAIW67l7yDfIPvxDsNIWWJcRd >>>>> 8brFYCAOPYE4LpuLGjtSgy370aBe9JmwAm41tE4qF0WhGpcu6TLsKjgMGWa/lHCc >>>>> JId8+WBfbbQT8XJj/d+3oOETn5/rglvlRhJbnNIwaQpTXxuMC5oz2nGW7rIpIkaA >>>>> OHo0D20DzGj4nxrQvijZ7DsMkk3F+KJu/4p7M6lpsIPCakknW1WD7IHRfbZ4Oldz >>>>> 2xH4HfIk7cAdA7i/YUNjlpSgWFQ5OU03J5HAYfC6W37wiGbjdBYf/PKVhJ8hz7+D >>>>> OCl+yCV00u4fCjlY6zXFea9pGr7Cl1P+sapwKDZ4g+NpNHxBUVY+ahbjQUHYON2W >>>>> sdzAsLpMMqavCr1o8mcXdm7IPRlLUK9QZUySC9DitPvoF8G2llTAz1mWa4/Oj7/S >>>>> JMiUERcaL5gdFN8EgEKkamFgLJguYquAjGtiowa51EMbnZG0Q2yWUcrEBFHWBEZT >>>>> RW1u6r4ChIrPE9X5ljfFpQyKG6jFhYFXG+iVlgTB7F2ZWhjPAXi/tLbBnvIcci1m >>>>> Md4XFm/bBJj/yNXdPuCi+CtvvdpZ/d4LQn4B7By5bIo1QjCb4Zx5n2Tq5xnYZUOI >>>>> CnSVnNSkwLbbrAVtYOVWnrSuwR33JQnqeGHdM+XYBBwKBRhrx+ZgFWD7N6Gm95PU >>>>> xXSxkgYVXI4sgi7Lh3Ia >>>>> =2Vmc >>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have on patch file that Lo sent. Three different files are on it with >>>> the assumption that the patch-root is /usr/src. I'm thinking about snipping >>>> it twice and then applying each subpatch within the proper subdirectory. >>>> Now, this would not when Index:reference is at the header of each, right? >>>> >>> One not one in first sentence. Insert hurt between not & when in last >>> sentence. >>> >>> I'm doing patch -p *.diff and the process is taking some time. What am >> I doing wrong? >> > Syntax. > Rebuild reinstall the source portions in common then find an application > that uses udplite, right? > "Duhhhh." > Thanks. > "Yuhhh" > There is x264 and wireshark as my available options for testing if udp lite works. Give me a moment because I have a single machine and need to setup a virtual graphics card.Received on Tue Mar 04 2014 - 06:25:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC