> > Does this mean the bug is fixed in 11-current? > Yes, the bug is fixed in 11-CURRENT, as of Subversion revision r262809. > > MFC? Is that to 10-STABLE? Your message is less than clear. > In FreeBSD, fixes are first applied to head (a.k.a -CURRENT), then > after a certain period they are merged to one more -STABLE branches, > depending on the type of fix. This procedure is traditionally called > a Merge From Current, MFC. > In this particular case, I will merge the fix to both 10-STABLE and > 9-STABLE. Older branches do not have clang, so merging the fix to > them makes no sense. > > I figure if firefox build fails, the bug would affect some other ports as well. > Don Lewis already mentioned the libxul port, and in general, any port > based on certain parts of the Mozilla source tree could be affected. > -Dimitry Thanks for response, but I went to FreeBSD website, got to mailing-list archives, in this case, svn-src-head. This made me feel safe that the bug was fixed, and I can rebuild 11-head system. But my last update might have been before the now-squashed bug was introduced. TomReceived on Thu Mar 06 2014 - 11:06:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC