On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:29:32 pm Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > hello, > > would anyone object to the following patch? I think this is fine. While you are at it, can you test this patch to remove D_NEEDGIANT? Index: subr_devstat.c =================================================================== --- subr_devstat.c (revision 263302) +++ subr_devstat.c (working copy) _at__at_ -460,7 +460,6 _at__at_ static d_mmap_t devstat_mmap; static struct cdevsw devstat_cdevsw = { .d_version = D_VERSION, - .d_flags = D_NEEDGIANT, .d_mmap = devstat_mmap, .d_name = "devstat", }; _at__at_ -482,13 +481,16 _at__at_ devstat_mmap(struct cdev *dev, vm_ooffset_t offset if (nprot != VM_PROT_READ) return (-1); + mtx_lock(&devstat_mutex); TAILQ_FOREACH(spp, &pagelist, list) { if (offset == 0) { *paddr = vtophys(spp->stat); + mtx_unlock(&devstat_mutex); return (0); } offset -= PAGE_SIZE; } + mtx_unlock(&devstat_mutex); return (-1); } -- John BaldwinReceived on Thu Mar 20 2014 - 13:22:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC