On Friday, October 31, 2014 4:08:06 pm Beeblebrox wrote: > First breakage in a long time. Error is: > > In file included from cancelpoints_sem_new.c:47: > /usr/src/lib/libc/../../include/semaphore.h:41:16: error: field has > incomplete type 'struct _usem2' > struct _usem2 _kern; > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/../../include/semaphore.h:41:9: note: forward declaration > of 'struct _usem2' > struct _usem2 _kern; > ^ > cancelpoints_sem_new.c:66:33: error: use of undeclared identifier > 'USEM_MAX_COUNT' > _Static_assert(SEM_VALUE_MAX <= USEM_MAX_COUNT, "SEM_VALUE_MAX too large"); > ^ > cancelpoints_sem_new.c:335:15: warning: implicit declaration of function > 'USEM_COUNT' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > *sval = (int)USEM_COUNT(sem->_kern._count); > ^ > cancelpoints_sem_new.c:342:23: error: use of undeclared identifier > 'UMTX_OP_SEM2_WAKE' > return _umtx_op(sem, UMTX_OP_SEM2_WAKE, 0, NULL, NULL); > ^ > cancelpoints_sem_new.c:361:23: error: use of undeclared identifier > 'UMTX_OP_SEM2_WAIT' > return _umtx_op(sem, UMTX_OP_SEM2_WAIT, 0, > ^ > cancelpoints_sem_new.c:445:14: error: use of undeclared identifier > 'USEM_HAS_WAITERS' > if (count & USEM_HAS_WAITERS) > ^ > 1 warning and 5 errors generated. Seems like your tree is not fully up to date? The changes to sem_new.c were committed in the same commit as the changes to sys/umtx.h. -- John BaldwinReceived on Tue Nov 11 2014 - 18:28:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:53 UTC