Re: Finding a rogue src/sys commit with bisection?

On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 11:03 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 11/15/14, 11:01 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:56:50AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >> On 11/15/14, 10:43 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>> Before I totally hose by /usr/src directory, does anyone
> >>> have some guidelines on doing a binary search for a rogue
> >>> commit in /usr/src/sys?.  Either cam or usb (or acpi?) has
> >>> broken the ability to remove a external USB device once it
> >>> is plugged into a usb port on my Dell Latitude D530 laptop.
> >>> I know that a good kernel can be built with r271273 and
> >>> a bad kernel comes from (nearly) top of tree at r274456.
> >>>
> >>> I assume I need to do somthing along the lines
> >>>
> >>> % cd /usr/src/sys
> >>> % svn merge -r 274456:272864    (half way point between good and bad)
> >>> (build kernel and test)
> >>> % cd /usr/src/sys
> >>> % svn revert -R .
> >>> (assume 272864 builds working kernel)
> >>> % svn merge -r 274456:273660   (1/2 point between 272864 and 274456).
> >>>
> >>> Rinse and repeat.
> >>>
> >> Use git, it has a built in bisector to shake this sort of thing out:
> >>
> > I won't be drawn into the git debate.
> >
> OK, so we don't want to use a tool purposefully built for the problem 
> you are facing?  Doesn't seem like a "git debate" more like hammering in 
> screws...
> 

This in-your-face git evangelism is getting REALLY OLD, REALLY FAST.
Please stop it.

I have nothing in particular against git, I just have no interest in it.
But that's rapidly transforming into active dislike in exact proportion
to being repeatedly talked down to by someone with a different opinion,
and apparently the belief that folks with other opinions just need more
repetitious condescention to see the light.

-- Ian