Re: send-pr must live

From: Chris H <bsd-lists_at_bsdforge.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:09:59 -0800
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:40:16 -0800 "Waitman Gobble" <waitman_at_waitman.net> wrote

> On Thu, November 20, 2014 9:25 am, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> > Nice idea. However I am working on reviving porttools to migrate within
> > bugzilla system. Maybe we can share some ideas.
> >
> > BR,
> > Muhammad
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Chris H <bsd-lists_at_bsdforge.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Greetings,
> >> While I recognize that send-pr has pretty much
> >> become useless, with the advent of bugzilla, being made the new
> >> "official" FreeBSD bug reporting system. I really
> >> miss send-pr, and was hoping I could revive it, eg; integrate it with
> >> bugzilla. I had even contemplated adding a feature that would allow it
> >> to also work with local port/system building structures people often use
> >> to build, and maintain FreeBSD. Any objections to my reviving send-pr?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you for all your time, and consideration.
> >>
> >>
> >> --Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> >
> >
> 
> I liked using send-pr. It looks like Bugzilla 5.0 will have a native REST
> API but current versions use plugin.  Also I believe Bugzilla supports an
> email interface so it could be possible to keep send-pr as a shell script.
Indeed. It is perfectly inclined to use email. Which makes
[initial] integration perfectly *trivial*. :)
As to it having been shell based. While there's nothing wrong with
that at all, in fact it's advantageous in many respects. I was toying
with the idea of perhaps converting (augmenting) it to being Perl
based, by way of a statically linked mini-perl interpreter. I thought
it would better *empower* it, also providing for a more "user friendly"
dialog. But, like I said; just *toying* with the idea. :)

--Chris

> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Waitman Gobble
> Los Altos California USA
> +1.510-830-7975
Received on Thu Nov 20 2014 - 17:09:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:54 UTC