On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:39:37PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Mark Johnston <markj_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 07:47:56PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Recent sources (Revision: 272529) fail to compile: > >> > >> [...] > >> cc -m32 -march=native -DCOMPAT_32BIT -isystem /usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include/ > >> -L/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -B/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -O2 -pipe -O3 -O3 > >> -pipe -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include/rpcsvc -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector > >> -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int > >> -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value > >> -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-switch > >> -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Qunused-arguments > >> -c /usr/src/lib/librpcsvc/yp_passwd.c -o yp_passwd.o --- all_subdir_libproc --- --- > >> libproc.so.3 --- /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: skipping > >> incompatible /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libctf.so when searching for > > > > I'm confused by this message. Are you building with -DNO_CLEAN? Do you > > have anything in make.conf or src.conf, especially anything that's > > changed since libctf was rebuilt? > > > > You might try rebuilding libctf with > > > > $ cd /usr/src > > $ make -C cddl/lib/libctf clean all > > > > but I'm not sure why ld is ignoring the existing libctf.so. > > The failure is coming while building the lib32 compat libraries. Are > we not currently building a lib32 libctf.so? No, we do. One thing I've noticed is that cddl/lib is built after lib/ when compiling 32-bit libs, whereas cddl/lib is built first when building natively. But that doesn't cause any problems for me. I also don't see why ld would be searching /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp for a 32-bit lib.Received on Sat Oct 04 2014 - 20:40:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:52 UTC