On 30/10/2014 14:15, Ed Maste wrote: > On 30 October 2014 09:21, Steven Hartland <killing_at_multiplay.co.uk> wrote: >> On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >>> (a) symbol files are for developers. Developers are clever people, often >>> with custom systems, they know how to deal with them as they already do >>> whatever they want anyway in 7 different ways. >> Yes and no, generating useful information from a users panic issue is >> something we really need to ensure is still possible. As where they aren't >> the developer, they are the source of the information. >> >> So maybe some sort of post processing utility? > We're also going to make debug data for userland (libraries and > binaries) available. On my system there's about 360MB of kernel debug > and 1.5GB of userland debug, and we definitely don't want to > unconditionally install all of that. Thus we're going to have to > provide the capability of installing debug data at install time or > later anyway, > > We already have some limited post-processing involved in kernel crash > handling - /etc/rc.d/savecore to pull the crash out of the swap/dump > partition, and crashinfo to extract useful information using kgdb. > There are many useful improvements we could make in kernel crash > handling, including having the process support on-demand fetching of > the kernel debug data. Yer that's the process that was in my head, if debug symbols aren't available when savecore runs we're going to need a way to update / rerun when they are available, or even better give it the ability to do the same job with remote symbols? > Sounds like having a way to not install symbols to the root partition for > *binary* installs is the real requirement? > That is a requirement, yes. > > Moving the debug data to a separate partition also opens up some > compelling use cases for large scale deployments, where multiple > systems run the same release. The machines can run from their own > install on disk, but have the infrequently-used debug data NFS mounted > from a common location. The / and /boot partitions may be mounted > read-only. Sound like a good idea :) > >>> The entire cp -pR kernel kernel.good solution is nothing I’d expect a user >>> to ever do. But I am aware that’s a “developer standard”. Maybe we just >>> need to improve the situation for ourselves rather than pessimising 98% of >>> users out there. >> Indeed. > ... >> I think overall there's options to move forward, we just need to ensure its >> not at the expense of usability for those that do have space. > Setting DEBUGDIR= in /etc/src.conf will retain the current behaviour > of installing the debug data beside the kernel and modules (and > userland binaries and libraries). Does this adequately address your > use case? Yep that works :) > >>> Whether that is /boot/kernel/symbols/* >>> or /usr/lib/***, I couldn’t care less > Note that if they go in /boot/kernel/symbols/ then we have to teach > GDB, LLDB, and other tools to look there; if they go in /usr/lib/debug > they're found automatically by the debuggers. > > We may have to add standalone debug path support to other tools, but > it's very little additional work. One thing to check would be to ensure that /usr is mounted when savecore runs. Regards SteveReceived on Thu Oct 30 2014 - 13:24:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:53 UTC