+--On 2 septembre 2014 13:47:32 +0200 Michelle Sullivan <michelle_at_sorbs.net> wrote: | Marcus von Appen wrote: |> Alban Hertroys <haramrae_at_gmail.com>: |> |>> |>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get |>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand |>> that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but |>> software vendors aren't that quick. For many, 2 years is a short time. |>> |> |> It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those |> issues |> in the time between tthe announcement and now. No one did. Now that it is |> gone, they are brought up, while they should have been long time ago |> instead. It can't work that way. |> |> My 2 cents in this discussion :-). | | Actually I brought it up as soon as I found the EOL was a deadline for | breaking pkg_* tools, was told, "too late now" - that was more than 2 | weeks ago, less than 2 months ago (forget the date) ... I'm happy with | an EOL and working to upgrade everything, I'm not happy that the EOL was | not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline. I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more. -- Mathieu ArnoldReceived on Wed Sep 03 2014 - 12:24:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:51 UTC