I think that currently vt_suspend / vt_resume are called at quite unsuitable times. For example, vt_suspend performs a vt switch which requires cooperation from an X server, but that could be problematic given that some devices may already be suspended. I believe that it is better to do what sc(4) does and use power_suspend / power_resume event handlers instead of device_suspend / device_resume methods. power_suspend event is posted when a kernel has not entered any special state yet. What do you think? -- Andriy GaponReceived on Tue Sep 30 2014 - 03:48:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:52 UTC