On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 07:46:40PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > ... > No, this is equally wrong. If the problem is due to uintmax_t not brought > in to the scope by other dependencies, explicit > #include <stdint.h> > should be added at the prologue. > > I am struggling for two days trying to pass my pending patches through > make tinderbox. I added the uintmax_t version into the mix right now > for the next try. OK; attached survived buildworld for both amd64 & i386, and I think it's what's intended. On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > ... > > So I took a bit of evasive action.) > > > The errors not very good, but I'm guessing your missing #include > <stdint.h> for uintmax_t where as u_int64_t is from sys/types.h iirc. > ... Quite so; thanks. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david_at_catwhisker.org Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:57 UTC