Re: unp gc vs socket close/shutdown race

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:21:10 -0700
On Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:51:57 AM Conrad Meyer wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> (Sorry In-Reply-To is wrong; gmail isn't the most flexible MUA and I
> was not subscribed to FreeBSD-Current until today.)
> 
> I have a slightly cleaned up version of this patch in phabricator at
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3044 . My mentor thinks it looks ok, but
> we would appreciate any feedback y'all have. The PR is here:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194264 .
> 
> Primary changes from MJG's patch:
> 
> * Rather than adding PR_DISPOSE2 flag, we just change dom_dispose KPI.
> Unix local domain is the only in-tree consumer.

I see you committed this to HEAD already and I certainly prefer fixing
the KPI in HEAD.  However, changing the domain KPI/KBI may not be MFC'able,
so you might need to use someting closer to Matuesz's original patch
when you merge.

-- 
John Baldwin
Received on Tue Aug 04 2015 - 22:04:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:59 UTC