On 8/13/15 11:23 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, August 13, 2015 04:13:43 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:00:06PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, July 26, 2015 03:26:22 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I was botherd to not have the merge(1) utility available in base (for etcupdate) >>>> when building base WITHOUT_RCS. >>>> >>>> So I have rewritten a merge(1) utility which should be compatible. >>>> >>>> I used the 3-way merge code from the fossil VCS instead of making it call diff3. >>>> All I have done from the fossil code is adapting it to use sbuf(9). >>>> >>>> The bonus for end users is the merge from fossil can resolve situation where the >>>> diff3 in base cannot. (which explains a "failure" with the GNU RCS test suite) >>>> >>>> meaning etcupdate will be more happy merge configuration files. >>> Thanks! This will save me from having to hack etcupdate to use diff3 instead >>> of merge. >> Hi, can I use etcupdate to update /etc w/o source tree? >> I.e. I take from new distro /var/db/etcupdate and try to update /etc? > etcupdate does a 3-way merge of an "old" stock /etc and a "new" stock /etc > into /etc. The "old" stock /etc is always stored in /var/db/etcupdate. > The "new" stock /etc has to come from somewhere. One option is to generate > it from /usr/src (e.g. after a buildworld). However, you can also pregenerate > tarballs from a /usr/src tree on one machine and then use those tarballs > instead of generating an /etc tree from /usr/src on another machine. I've > used this for upgrades of a cluster of machines where a single machine would > build release "images" that were basically a buildworld + an 'etcupdate build' > from the corresponding src tree. I then used 'etcupdate -t /path/to/tarball' > to update /etc after installing the new world. > > The idea is that for something like freebsd-update one could ship the latest > etcupdate build tarball on each update to do a full 3-way merge of /etc. > what is the rational for using etcupdate instead of mergemaster when upgrading?Received on Fri Aug 14 2015 - 13:19:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:59 UTC