Re: Kernel panic with fresh current, probably nfs related

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:18:00AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/23/15 18:36, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> > Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c 
> > ===================================================================
> >
> > 
> - --- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c	(revision 287087)
> > +++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c	(working copy) _at__at_ -3044,7 +3044,7 _at__at_
> > em_setup_interface(device_t dev, struct adapter *a 
> > if_setioctlfn(ifp, em_ioctl); if_setgetcounterfn(ifp,
> > em_get_counter); /* TSO parameters */ -	ifp->if_hw_tsomax =
> > EM_TSO_SIZE; +	ifp->if_hw_tsomax = IP_MAXPACKET; 
> > ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegcount = EM_MAX_SCATTER; 
> > ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegsize = EM_TSO_SEG_SIZE;
> 
> 
> Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first
> place.  What's the scenario that seems to work here?  NFS seems happy
> with/without the patch so I'm not confident in anything we are doing her
> e.

I see several patches here. Which one should I be using?

-- 
Joel